Value time to fix not quality

One thing that I think has been really good recently at the Guardian is the promotion of the idea that what matters is understanding what is critical to our business and valuing quality only in these critical areas. For everything else the thing we should strive to improve is the time to fix. I.e. how long it takes from a problem being reported to it being fixed in production.

If we have a short or tiny time to fix then we can relax a lot of the traditional fixtures of software development like regression testing and metrics like bugs found in production.

What is also interesting is that when you do fix problems you can also look at how long the problem took to be reported and who reported it. If a problem was reported very quickly by a user then you have an indicator that a feature is perhaps more important than you thought.

If on the other hand a problem was reported a week after it occurred and not by the assumed consumers of the feature but by another group or department you have saved yourself a lot of time and effort in having to verify a feature that perhaps does not deserve to exist at all.


2 thoughts on “Value time to fix not quality

  1. I do know that some of ours do look at this. It definitely has identified gaps in reporting for example and also gave some insight into what really are significant revenue flows. Mostly however product management is still “vision” rather than evidence-based.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s